» A person becomes familiar with a greengrocer during the trades of fruit market. After a while, the greengrocer says that: “I have recently married and has no guarantor for taking marriage loan and no acquaintance either”. The first person, who had no knowledge about the greengrocer and just wanted to help him, takes the greengrocer to a teacher who was taking his salary f r o m that bank and has a far acquaintance with him, and introduces the greengrocer as his brother-in-law and that teacher becomes his guarantor. The greengrocer has taken the loan and unfortunately, doesn’t pay the installments. Accordingly, bank takes the installments f r o m the salary of the teacher. Now, the guarantor demands the installments f r o m the person who has introduced the greengrocer. Please answer the two following questions about this matter:
1) Is the introducer responsible for the installments, which that young person didn’t have paid and the bank has taken f r o m the teacher’s salary?
2) By considering that the teacher has enough documents f r o m the greengrocer in order to take his right legally, is it fair to put the introducer, who has performed this act because of inexperience, under the pressure and demand his money?
Replier: Makarem Shirazi، Ayatollah Naser